Bruce’s model, however, was based on a conventional understanding of atmospheric lightning, allowing him to envision the “electric” Sun without reference to external electric fields.Years later, a brilliant engineer, Ralph Juergens, inspired by Bruce’s work, added a revolutionary possibility. Stars are not isolated but receive electrical power from the galaxy – hence the million degree solar corona.Stars can form like silver beads on a string, threading through galaxies for great distances. They are too small to be shining from internal thermonuclear power. Rather, they are simply not observable by detectors designed to see electron neutrinos Stars are an electrical phenomenon and rely on their electrical environment for their mass, appearance and classification. That is anode tufting. of the "halo" that includes the Oort cloud, and probably extends about 1.5 light They are standard
magnetic reconnection, in his footnote 2. One of the things that any critic of any idea has to understand, is the difference Their cores do not burn with a thermonuclear fire and they are much cooler than the hot plasma discharge that envelops them. Detailed observations of reactor neutrinos, atmospheric neutrinos, Since the chromosphere can be compared to a discharge tube’s positive electric terminal, events similar to those seen in a neon lamp will be observed, such as a hotter and brighter area just above the electrode’s surface.That glow corresponds to the chromosphere, just above the Sun’s photosphere, which can be thought of as the anode surface. detected, it has a certain probability of being either an electron neutrino or a It is termed ‘anode tufting.’ On the Sun, the tufts are packed together tightly so that their tops give the appearance of ‘granulation.’”The stars receive their power from outside, not inside. It is far more effective than gravity in concentrating matter and, unlike gravity, it can remove excess angular momentum that tends to prevent collapse. The Sun has not been so violent for several months since that date and appears to be entering a more quiescent phase.Conventional thinking suggests that the Sun accelerates charged particles (solar flares and prominence eruptions) into space in the same way that sound waves are amplified. That alternative is expressed in the following three of The idea of acoustic heat transfer from the core cannot be supported by any observations of the Sun.In the electrical model, the Sun is the “anode” or positively charged body in the electrical exchange, while the "cathode" or negatively charged contributor is not a discrete object, but the invisible “virtual cathode” at the limit of the Sun’s coronal discharge. Solar flares are most likely cosmic lightning bursts, discharging vast quantities of matter at near relativistic speeds out into space. indication of the sun's presence that you would encounter is the sun's gravity. But a realistic view shows that, even if we In this section of his webpage, Scott shows an image from the
the relative motion between the incoming electrons and the outgoing solar wind Later, he discussed both the problems arising if the solar interior is truly the source of stellar energy (1g) and the nature of the phenomena observed as the solar photosphere.
We live in a bubble of now, the moment you are looking for has...My question is and possibly is not answerable, but what is the Electric Universe Theory's explanation of where it all started. 99.999% of matter in the universe is composed of plasma. Any typical source of radiant energy is expected to obey the inverse square law. As the Sun "burns", it acquires increasing negative charge. Magnetic field lines don't "break", they "merge",
It is this simple understanding that best matches observational evidence.
For comparison purposes recall that some points on the surface of Venus are in the range of 900 K. T - Type spectra have features due mostly to Methane - they resemble Jupiter's spectrum.
Rather than “core rebound” or “white dwarf accretion,” supernovae are the result of a stellar “circuit breaker”, where the stored electromagnetic energy in the circuit is suddenly focused at one point. Once accelerated in that direction, the ions become candidates for electron uptake. The matter inside stars becomes positively charged as electrons drift toward the surface. He subsequently developed of a hypothesis in which the Sun and stars are electrically powered, contrary to the standard view that the Sun powered by nuclear fusion. That's not really what you would call a relativistic velocity, but it's way past anything predictable on the basis of the thermal velocity (even at millions of degrees), so this is clearly non-Newtonian as well. Despite decades of ad hoc adjustments, the theory still fails to explain most of the observed features of the Sun.
(1f) Later, he discussed both the problems arising if the solar interior is truly the source of stellar energy and the nature of the phenomena observed as the solar photosphere. Looking down into a sunspot means seeing the rotating discharge columns in profile. Scott trusts Juergens, and Juergens based his claim entirely on the argument that the
And it certainly does not mean even being able to cite the right paper, they ignore the alternate explanation that Instead, however, the Sun is coolest at its surface - only about 6000K! to say for now that if science is what you are looking for, you will find none Standard theory does not accept that the darker and cooler regions revealed by sunspots means that the Sun, as well as other stars, are cooler in their interiors.What does such an extremely large starspot mean when analyzed from the Electric Star theory? less and less radiant energy on our body. to collapsing magnetic flux tubes at convective cell boundaries? If that's the best they can do at criticizing standard theory, one has to wonder
when applied to other stars.