I am disturbed that the narrative has changed, to me it's significant because essentially Phillips was unarmed at that moment in time before he was killed. Officers seizing property for the purpose of dealing with an emergency indemnifies the store.
They arrived 18 minutes after the shooting had started, armed with AR-15s. The two robbers attempted to flee the scene, Phillips on foot and Mătăsăreanu in their getaway vehicle, while continuing to engage the officers. However, the cops had the area surrounded before the gunmen got away from the bank. I won't edit it, but it seems like something that should have a reference. However, sources say Mătăsăreanu was unable to start the truck, because the driver had turned the vehicle and fuel pumps off, leaving the keys in the ignition while others say that it was because the driver had taken the keys with him after leaving the car. The only reason the rifles have been incorrectly listed as Romanian AiMS is the VFG on Phillips rifle which slightly resembles the VFG on a AiMS 90...although the VFG in question was actually manufactured by a company in Texas. Prior to 1997, only LAPD SWAT officers were authorized to carry .45 ACP caliber pistols, specifically the Model 1911A1 .45 ACP semiautomatic pistol.The LAPD did not allow Mătăsăreanu to receive medical attention, stating that ambulance personnel were following standard procedure in hostile situations by refusing to enter “the hot zone,” as Mătăsăreanu was still considered to be dangerous. Also, it says Phillips used an AIM - whatever that is. "both robbers were killed" - contradictory statements made within the same article should be corrected by Third Opinion In desert storm? --If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Reality: 2 guys, with 3,300 rnds of ammo, laying down short bursts of suppressive fire, so their cohorts can escape from the opposite side of 6600 Laurel Canyon. Of course, the reference should be the coroner's report, but how do we find it? I don't see a shooting by police of an armed individual and a shooting of armed indviduals by the police as being related. See my sources.And, of course, the US Army field manual defining both cover and concealment.
Phillips and Matasareanu ... were notorious for their heavy armament, which included automatic assault rifles." I personally tend to ignore unsigned comments. Did they have I distinctly remember that one of the robbers was armed with a g3 or hk91 clone, anybody have images of this incident that can confirm this? It seems to me that the story has changed from the story I saw in the video and the written narrative posted along with it. By whom? At least one SWAT officer fired his AR-15 below the cars and wounded Mătăsăreanu in his unprotected lower legs; he was soon unable to continue and put his hands up to show surrender. Really, why would a business that helped It was a G3A4. --- 16 april 2010 11 police officers were wounded by gunfire.
The ineffectiveness of the standard police patrol weaponry in penetrating the robbers’ body armor led to a trend in the United States toward arming selected police patrol officers with semi-automatic 5.56 mm AR-15 type rifles.
Even two car doors and the passenger compartment offer little protection, and even that protection can be expected to evaporate when multiple rounds are fired. What earlier shootout? Also, why does this thing say at one point that their body armor stopped the police from shooting them and in another point that there were multiple penetrations of their bodyarmor? Try to Google "Decebal" and then "Dechebal". They were only able to get US$303,305, instead of the expected US$750,000 because the bank had altered the delivery schedule.The first-responding officers outside heard the gunfire from the bank and made another radio call to summon additional units, and proceeded to take cover behind their patrol car, weapons trained on the bank doors. Tuesday, August 11, 2020 The police radioed for an ambulance, but Mătăsăreanu, swearing erratically and still goading the police to shoot him, died before the ambulance could reach the scene almost seventy minutes later. --Cars are not considered "safe" cover by any means...Regular .223 you can buy at any store will zip right through them and the armor-piercing ammo he had was probably just FMJ.
Multiple officers and civilians were wounded in the seven to eight minutes from when the shooting began to when Mătăsăreanu entered the robbers’ white sedan to make a getaway. Some reports indicate that he was lying on the ground with no weapons for approximately an hour before ambulances arrived. Or, if it's unavailable to the public, where do we find a statement made by police or others referring to the report? The article mentions that the gunmen used Norincos, but then it switches to AKM mid-article. I am pretty concerned that a lot of the citations look a bit false, so I am hoping that someone properly checks them out in the coming week to verify them. I can confirm this 100%. No, because we are not interested in what is demonstrable and true, only in that which we can cite!!! At this time, the current phrasing is: Police officers do not enjoy some special status. The detective had been firing at Phillips; one of his rounds, a ricochet, struck the gunman's hand, while another hit the HK-91's trigger group. I sat there dumbfounded as a car drove slowly by. The weapon was jammed and besides it simply wasn't pointed at his own body before the head shot came in. We were high speed, Tradoc be dammed.
- xchsxbigxmike Also, I thought my elephants response rather funny. What's this crap about a training film? If they have been identified as the gunmen, the lead should be fixed. that police and authority have the right to commandeer property It depends on the weapons used, and how thick the wall is. He was then shot in the right hand, briefly dropped the pistol, retrieved it, and placed the muzzle of his pistol under his chin and shot himself.